Note
Go to the end to download the full example code.
An illustrated example of a FORM probability estimate¶
Abstract¶
In this example we illustrate the different steps of a FORM/SORM analysis on a simple example. We focus on the different steps and compare them with an analytic computation whenever possible.
See FORM and SORM and to get more theoretical details.
import openturns as ot
import openturns.viewer as otv
import numpy as np
Context¶
We consider a bivariate random vector with the following independent components that follow:
the exponential distribution with parameter , ;
the standard unit normal distribution .
The support of the input vector is
dist_X1 = ot.Exponential(1.0)
dist_X2 = ot.Normal()
dist_X = ot.JointDistribution([dist_X1, dist_X2])
We can draw the isolines of the PDF of the distribution dist_X:
ot.ResourceMap.SetAsUnsignedInteger("Contour-DefaultLevelsNumber", 8)
graph_PDF = dist_X.drawPDF([0.0, -10.0], [20.0, 10.0])
graph_PDF.setTitle(r"2D-PDF of the input variables $(X_1, X_2)$")
graph_PDF.setXTitle(r"$x_1$")
graph_PDF.setYTitle(r"$x_2$")
graph_PDF.setLegendPosition("lower right")
contours = graph_PDF.getDrawable(0).getImplementation()
contours.setColorMapNorm("log")
graph_PDF.setDrawable(contours, 0)
view = otv.View(graph_PDF, square_axes=True)
/home/devel/project/build/python/src/site-packages/openturns/viewer.py:729: UserWarning: Attempt to set non-positive ylim on a log-scaled axis will be ignored.
colorbar = self._fig.colorbar(
We consider the model from into defined by:
We start by drawing the isolines of the model .
g = ot.SymbolicFunction(["x1", "x2"], ["x1 * x2"])
graph_model = g.draw([0.0, -10.0], [20.0, 10.0])
graph_model.setXTitle(r"$x_1$")
graph_model.setYTitle(r"$x_2$")
graph_model.setTitle(r"Isolines of the model : $g$")
view = otv.View(graph_model, square_axes=True)
We consider the univariate output variable :
We want to estimate the probability of the output variable to be greater than a prescribed threshold : this is the failure event. This probability is simply expressed for a continuous random vector as:
(1)¶
where:
is the failure domain and is the probability density function (PDF) of .
We first define random vectors and the failure event associated to the output random variable.
vector_X = ot.RandomVector(dist_X)
vector_Y = ot.CompositeRandomVector(g, vector_X)
s = 10.0
event = ot.ThresholdEvent(vector_Y, ot.Greater(), s)
The boundary of the failure domain can easily be represented as it is a branch of an hyperbole: the boundary is the graph of the function defined from into by:
(2)¶
The boundary of the failure domain is also the isoline of the model associated to the level :
We can draw it with the draw method of the function .
nb_points = 101
graph_g = g.draw([0.0, -10.0], [20.0, 10.0], [nb_points] * 2)
draw_boundary = graph_g.getDrawable(0)
draw_boundary.setLevels([s])
draw_boundary.setLegend(r"Boundary $\partial \mathcal{D}$")
graph_g.setDrawables([draw_boundary])
texts = [r" $\mathcal{D} = \{(x_1, x_2)\, |\, g(x_1, x_2) \geq 10 \}$"]
text_graph = ot.Text([[10.0, 3.0]], texts)
text_graph.setTextSize(1)
text_graph.setColor("black")
graph_g.add(text_graph)
graph_g.setTitle("Failure domain in the physical space")
graph_g.setXTitle(r"$x_1$")
graph_g.setYTitle(r"$x_2$")
graph_g.setLegendPosition("topright")
view = otv.View(graph_g, square_axes=True)
We can superimpose the event boundary with the bivariate PDF insolines of the input distribution:
draw_boundary.setColor("black")
graph_PDF.add(draw_boundary)
graph_PDF.setLegendPosition("lower right")
view = otv.View(graph_PDF, square_axes=True)
From the previous figure, we observe that in the failure domain, the PDF takes small (and even very small) values. Consequently the failure probability is also expected to be small. The FORM/SORM methods estimate the failure probability.
The FORM/SORM approximations¶
The basic steps of the FORM and SORM algorithms are:
use an isoprobabilistic transformation to map the input random vector into the standard space;
find the design point which is the nearest point to the origin in the standard space;
estimate the probability.
Isoprobabilistic transformation¶
The interest of the isoprobabilistic transformation is the rotational invariance of the distribution in the standard space. This property reduces the dimension of the problem to 1. See Isoprobabilistic transformation for more theoretical details.
OpenTURNS has several isoprobabilistic transformations, depending on the distribution of the input random vector:
the Nataf transformation is used if the input distribution has a normal copula,
the Generalized Nataf transformation is used if the input distribution has an elliptical copula,
the Rosenblatt transformation is used in any other cases.
The Nataf and Rosenblatt transformations map the input random vector into a vector that follows a normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance. The Generalized Nataf transformation maps the input random vector into a vector that follows the standard elliptical distribution associated to the elliptical copula of the input distribution.
In this example, the input distribution is not elliptical so the isoprobabilistic transformation is the Rosenblatt transformation.
print("Is Elliptical ? ", dist_X.isElliptical())
Is Elliptical ? False
The Rosenblatt transformation is defined by:
(3)¶
such that the random vector follows a bivariate normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance. It follows that the components and are independent.
We detail the Rosenblatt transform in this simple case where the input random vector has independent components. Then, the Rosenblatt transform is defined by:
where is the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of and the CDF of the univariate normal distribution with zero mean and unit variance. Note that in this example, as . The isoprobabilistic transform and its inverse are methods of the distribution:
transformation = dist_X.getIsoProbabilisticTransformation()
inverse_transformation = dist_X.getInverseIsoProbabilisticTransformation()
Let us detail this transformation, step by step. We draw a realization of the random input vector. This point is said to be in the physical space.
xi = vector_X.getRealization()
We build zi the mapping of xi through the Rosenblatt transformation. The point zi is said to be in the standard space. Note that the second component remained unchanged.
ui = [dist_X1.computeCDF(xi[0]), dist_X2.computeCDF(xi[1])]
zi = [ot.Normal().computeQuantile(ui[0])[0], ot.Normal().computeQuantile(ui[1])[0]]
print(xi, "->", ui, "->", zi)
[0.38973,-0.540729] -> [0.32276015315467066, 0.2943473026427408] -> [-0.4599943077266245, -0.5407286830219163]
We also build the isoprobabilistic transform and its inverse for the first marginal:
(4)¶
transform_X1 = dist_X1.getIsoProbabilisticTransformation()
inverse_transform_X1 = dist_X1.getInverseIsoProbabilisticTransformation()
We can implement the transformation using on the first components directly using on both components xi:
zi1D = [transform_X1([xi[0]])[0], xi[1]]
zi2D = transformation(xi)
We can check the result of our experiment : we observe the results are the same.
print("zi = ", zi)
print("zi1D = ", zi1D)
print("zi2D = ", zi2D)
zi = [-0.4599943077266245, -0.5407286830219163]
zi1D = [-0.4599943077266245, -0.5407286830219165]
zi2D = [-0.459994,-0.540729]
The model in the standard space is defined by:
We can define it using the capacities of the composition of functions implemented in the library.
g_tilde = ot.ComposedFunction(g, inverse_transformation)
The failure domain in the standard space is defined by:
and its boundary is defined by:
We draw the graph of in the standard space.
graph_standard_space = g_tilde.draw([0.0, 0.0], [7.0, 7.0], [101] * 2)
draw_boundary_stand_space = graph_standard_space.getDrawable(0)
draw_boundary_stand_space.setLevels([s])
draw_boundary_stand_space.setLegend(r"Boundary $\partial \mathcal{\tilde{D}}$")
graph_standard_space.setDrawables([draw_boundary_stand_space])
graph_standard_space.setXTitle(r"$z_1$")
graph_standard_space.setYTitle(r"$z_2$")
graph_standard_space.setTitle("Failure domain in the standard space")
We add some annotations
texts = [r"$\mathcal{\tilde{D}} = \{(z_1, z_2)\, |\, \tilde{g}(z_1, z_2) \geq 10 \}$"]
text_graph = ot.Text([[4.0, 3.0]], texts)
text_graph.setTextSize(1)
text_graph.setColor("black")
graph_standard_space.add(text_graph)
graph_standard_space.setLegendPosition("topright")
view = otv.View(graph_standard_space, square_axes=True)
The design point¶
Due to the spherical distribution in the standard space, the area that contributes the most to the integral defining the probability is the vicinity of the closest point of the failure domain to the origin of the standard space. Then the second step of the method is to find this point, the design point, through a minimization problem under constraints.
We configure the Cobyla solver that we use for the optimization :
solver = ot.Cobyla()
solver.setMaximumIterationNumber(10000)
solver.setMaximumAbsoluteError(1.0e-3)
solver.setMaximumRelativeError(1.0e-3)
solver.setMaximumResidualError(1.0e-3)
solver.setMaximumConstraintError(1.0e-3)
We build the FORM algorithm with its basic constructor. The starting point for the optimization algorithm is the mean of the input distribution.
algo_FORM = ot.FORM(solver, event, dist_X.getMean())
We are ready to run the algorithm and store the result.
algo_FORM.run()
result = algo_FORM.getResult()
The design point can be retrieved in both physical and standard space with respectively the getPhysicalSpaceDesignPoint and getStandardSpaceDesignPoint methods. We denote them respectively and .
design_point_physical_space = result.getPhysicalSpaceDesignPoint()
design_point_standard_space = result.getStandardSpaceDesignPoint()
print("Design point in physical space : ", design_point_physical_space)
print("Design point in standard space : ", design_point_standard_space)
Design point in physical space : [4.84183,2.06513]
Design point in standard space : [2.41384,2.06513]
We can get the Hasofer index with the getHasoferReliabilityIndex method which is the distance of the design point to the origin:
beta_HL = result.getHasoferReliabilityIndex()
print("Hasofer index : ", beta_HL)
Hasofer index : 3.176696193499833
We visualize the design point on the previous graph.
cloud = ot.Cloud([design_point_standard_space])
cloud.setColor("red")
cloud.setPointStyle("fcircle")
cloud.setLegend(r"design point $z^*$")
graph_standard_space.add(cloud)
graph_standard_space.setGrid(True)
graph_standard_space.setLegendPosition("lower right")
cc = ot.Curve(
[0.0, design_point_standard_space[0]],
[0.0, design_point_standard_space[1]],
r"$\beta_{HL}$ distance",
)
cc.setLineStyle("dashed")
cc.setColor("black")
graph_standard_space.add(cc)
graph_standard_space.setLegendPosition("topright")
view = otv.View(graph_standard_space, square_axes=True)
The FORM approximation¶
The last step of the FORM algorithm is to replace the failure domain boundary by the hyperplane which is tangent to the failure domain at the design point in the standard space. To draw this hyperplane , we define the function from to defined by:
where is the gradient of the function at the design point . Then, the tangent hyperplane is the isoline associated to the zero level of the previous function :
We can use the LinearFunction
class.
center = design_point_standard_space
grad_design_point = g_tilde.gradient(design_point_standard_space)
constant = [0.0]
linear_mat = ot.Matrix(1, 2)
linear_mat[0, 0] = grad_design_point[0, 0]
linear_mat[0, 1] = grad_design_point[1, 0]
linear_proj = ot.LinearFunction(center, constant, linear_mat)
graph_tangent = linear_proj.getMarginal(0).draw([0.0, 0.0], [7.0, 7.0], [101] * 2)
draw_tangent = graph_tangent.getDrawable(0)
draw_tangent.setLevels([0])
draw_tangent.setLegend(r"$\mathcal{\Pi}_{z^*}$ (FORM)")
draw_tangent.setColor("green")
draw_tangent.setLineStyle("dashed")
graph_standard_space.add(draw_tangent)
graph_standard_space.setLegendPosition("topright")
view = otv.View(graph_standard_space, square_axes=True)
Depending on whether the origin of the standard space belongs to the failure domain, the FORM probability is defined by:
where is the marginal cumulative distribution function along any direction of the spherical distribution in the standard space. In this example, this is the normal distribution. So we have:
isOriginFail = result.getIsStandardPointOriginInFailureSpace()
normal = ot.Normal()
if isOriginFail:
pf_FORM = normal.computeCDF(beta_HL)
else:
pf_FORM = normal.computeCDF(-beta_HL)
print("FORM : Pf_FORM = ", pf_FORM)
FORM : Pf_FORM = 0.0007448149708283228
This failure probability is implemented but the FORM algorithm and can be obtained with the getEventProbability method. We check we have the same result.
pf = result.getEventProbability()
print("Probability of failure (FORM) Pf_FORM = ", pf)
Probability of failure (FORM) Pf_FORM = 0.0007448149708283228
The SORM approximation¶
The SORM approximation uses the main curvatures of the homothetic of the failure domain at distance 1 from the origin. These curvatures are calculated at the design point. They are linked to the curvatures of the failure domain by:
The Breitung approximation is valid for and is defined by :
and approximates the boundary by the osculating paraboloid at the design point.
Note that the term does not depend on .
In this example, we can easily implement the boundary of the failure domain in the physical space, using the function defined in (2).
In the standard space, the boundary is defined by the composed function .
failure_boundary_physical_space = ot.SymbolicFunction(["x"], ["10.0 / x"])
failure_boundary_standard_space = ot.ComposedFunction(
failure_boundary_physical_space, inverse_transform_X1
)
We need the value of the second derivative of the failure boundary function at the abscissa of the design point in the standard space:
z1_star = [design_point_standard_space[0]]
dz1_star = failure_boundary_standard_space.getGradient().gradient(z1_star)
d2z1_star = failure_boundary_standard_space.getHessian().hessian(z1_star)
print("first component of the design point = ", z1_star[0])
print(
"second component of the design point = ",
failure_boundary_standard_space(z1_star)[0],
)
print(
"value of the hessian of the failure boundary at this abscissa= ",
d2z1_star[0, 0, 0],
)
first component of the design point = 2.413844253971037
second component of the design point = 2.065335164471684
value of the hessian of the failure boundary at this abscissa= 0.9401058369722994
In the standard space, the osculating parabola at is the graph of the function defined by:
z = np.linspace(1.1, 4.0, 100)
parabola = (
failure_boundary_standard_space(z1_star)[0]
+ dz1_star[0, 0] * (z - z1_star)
+ 0.5 * d2z1_star[0, 0, 0] * (z - z1_star) ** 2
)
curve_parabola = ot.Curve(z, parabola, r"$\mathcal{P}_{z^*}$ (SORM)")
curve_parabola.setLineStyle("dashed")
curve_parabola.setColor("orange")
graph_standard_space.add(curve_parabola)
graph_standard_space.setLegendPosition("topright")
view = otv.View(graph_standard_space)
The next step is to estimate the principal curvatures of the osculating paraboloid.
For any regular function the curvature at the point in cartesian coordinates reads as:
For the osculating parabola of concern we use the previously computed gradient and Hessian previously computed:
curvature = (d2z1_star[0, 0, 0]) / (1 + (dz1_star[0, 0]) ** 2) ** (3 / 2)
print("Curvature (analytic formula) = ", curvature)
Curvature (analytic formula) = 0.2575913913877353
We build the SORM algorithm and run it :
algo_SORM = ot.SORM(solver, event, dist_X.getMean())
algo_SORM.run()
The SORM result is obtained with the getResult method:
result_SORM = algo_SORM.getResult()
The principal curvatures of the osculating paraboloid at the design point is obtained by the getSortedCurvatures method:
print("Curvature (library) = ", result_SORM.getSortedCurvatures()[1])
Curvature (library) = 0.25761034541451805
Once the curvature is computed, there are several ways of approximating the failure probability . The library implements the Breitung, Hohenbichler and Tvedt estimates. We detail here the calculus of the Breitung approximation.
coeff = (1.0 + beta_HL * curvature) ** (-0.5)
if isOriginFail:
pf_SORM = (normal.computeCDF(beta_HL)) * coeff
else:
pf_SORM = (normal.computeCDF(-beta_HL)) * coeff
print("SORM : Pf_SORM = ", pf_SORM)
SORM : Pf_SORM = 0.0005523531956154584
We can compare with the different estimators:
pf_Breitung = result_SORM.getEventProbabilityBreitung()
pf_Hohenbichler = result_SORM.getEventProbabilityHohenbichler()
pf_Tvedt = result_SORM.getEventProbabilityTvedt()
print("Probability of failure (SORM Breintung) Pf = ", pf_Breitung)
print("Probability of failure (SORM Hohenbichler) Pf = ", pf_Hohenbichler)
print("Probability of failure (SORM Tvedt) Pf = ", pf_Tvedt)
Probability of failure (SORM Breintung) Pf = 0.0005523440504786004
Probability of failure (SORM Hohenbichler) Pf = 0.0005420328660300074
Probability of failure (SORM Tvedt) Pf = 0.0005381057564255441
Display all figures
otv.View.ShowAll()
Reset default settings
ot.ResourceMap.Reload()